Nanomaterials

Nanomaterials are a set of substances in which at least one dimension is less than approximately 100 nm which is approximately 100,000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair.

Uses of Nanomaterials:

Nanomaterials are being used in a number of commercial consumer products such as stain-resistant and wrinklefree textiles, cosmetics, sun screens, paints etc. A few more examples are –

  1. There are novel UV blocking coatings on glass bottles which protect beverages from damage by sunlight.
  2. Nanoscale titanium dioxide is finding applications in cosmetics and self cleaning windows.
  3. Using butyl rubber nano-clay composites, long lasting tennis balls are made.

Classification of Nanomaterials:

  1. Zero dimensional spheres and clusters
  2. One dimensional nanofibres, wires and rods
  3. Two dimensional films, plates and networks
  4. Three dimensional nanomaterials.

Structural Features:

  • Large fraction of surface atoms
  • High surface energy
  • Spatial confinement
  • Reduced imperfections
Advertisements

Trick to Learn Metal Reactivity Series

Metals which are placed above Hydrogen in Metal Reactivity Series are more reactive than Hydrogen and thus can displace Hydrogen from a solution. On the other hand, metals below Hydrogen are considered to be stable at normal condition.

Thank you for reading. 🙂

Use of Infrared Spectroscopy in Catalytic Characterization

The IR-Spectroscopy is very useful for characterization of catalyst. It is already known that IR measurement can be used to study the nature of bonding of small molecules such as CO (Carbon monoxide) to the surface of transition metal catalyst.

Some of the important uses of IR Spectroscopy in catalyst characterization are —

  1. IR-Spectroscopy, for the first time showed that benzene loses its aromatic character when it is absorbed on certain catalyst.
  2. When Hydrogen gas is adsorbed on ZnO catalyst, dissociation leads to formation of ZnH and OH linkage on the surface. This could be detected with IR-Spectroscopy.
  3. IR-Spectroscopy conclusively proved that when HCHO is adsorbed on butyl surface, only C-H linkage are formed and no CH2 linkage.
  4. When amines are interacted into clay catalyst, IR-Spectroscopy showed that protonated species are formed on the surface.
  5. When HCOOH comes into contact with a large number of metal surfaces, IR-Spectroscopy showed that the metal gets covered with a monomolecular layer.
  6. IR-Spectroscopy can also identify various Bronsted and Lewis acid site on the catalyst when bases like pyridine is adsorbed.

Thanks for reading 🙂

Characterisation of Industrial Catalyst

All industrial catalysts must have the following properties :

  • It should adsorb one or more reactants sufficiently strongly.
  • The adsorption must not be strong to prevent desorption of products.

For example :

Silver (Ag) — Doesn’t have strong adsorption properties.

Tungsten (W) — Adsorbs very strongly so desorption will not occur. So, Ag and W are not considered as good catalyst but Pt and Ni fulfills both the conditions to become good catalyst.

The two most important considerations for a solid to become good catalyst are–

  • High activity.
  • Long term stability or durability.

Thanks for reading. 🙂

[Explanation]: Concept of Photoelectron Spectroscopy (PES)

Photoelectron Spectroscopy (PES) is an excellent technique for determining atomic and molecular electronic energy levels. When an atom or molecule is subjected to high energy radiation, electrons are ejected due to collision with photon. (This experiment proves particle nature of electrons.)
Instrumentation:

Monochromatic X-ray or UV-rays fall on the sample and ejected electrons pass between a pair of electrically charged hemispherical plates which acts as a filter of kinetic energy.

Figure: UVPES and XPES

Types of PES:

Generally PES are of two types-

 1.  UVPES

In UVPES, UV radiation (a He lamp of wavelength 58.4nm and energy 21.2 eV) falls on the atoms and eject electrons. Since, UV has a very low energy, it can eject only the valence electrons.
 2. XPES

X-rays (K line of Aluminium and Magnesium of energy 1486.6 eV and 1536.2 eV) fall on the metal or atom and eject electrons. Since, X-rays are highly energetic, it can eject core electrons also.
Both these techniques are used to study different properties of catalytic surfaces. That is why both these techniques are known as Electronic Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis, ESCA.
Thanks for reading 🙂

​Density Functional Theory: A Philosophical Explanation

Density Functional Theory was proposed in 1970s. The idea behind the Density Functional Theory (DFT) can be understood from a well known and widely popular story of Archimedes. It was 200 B.C. when Archimedes proposed his theory on ‘Density’, which is proportional to the displacement of water of a particular mass by that substance. Knowing density, we can find various other properties of that substance, like volume, mass depending on its value we can predict whether a substance will float or sink in a particular liquid, whether an aeroplane will fly or not etc. Not only macroscopic substance, but also we can predict the properties of the molecules depending on its electron densities. This is the basis of this theory.

DFT is different from the Hartree-Fock theory in the sense that the later completely depends on the total molecular wave function of the molecule on the other hand, the former depends on the density of electron cloud. So we need to call it- Density ‘Function’ Theory (cause it calculates energy and all related things as a function of density), but why the term ‘Functional’ is used in place of ‘Function’. The suffix ‘-al’ is related more to the mathematics than the philosophy.

According to mathematics,

if y= f(x) (Read: y is a function of x)

and z= f(y),

then z= [x] (Read: z is a functional of x)

In mathematics, function of a function is known as functional. This is how the term ‘Functional’ came in Density Functional Theory.

Let me explain it technically,

E.g, E = f(density) = f(radius),

Therefore, energy and radius are in functional relationship.

We know,

Total Energy of a molecule,

E = E(ke)+E (n,n)+E (e,n)+E(xc)

Where,

E(ke)= Kinetic energy of electrons

E (n,n)= Nuclear-Nuclear repulsion energy

E (e,n)= Electron-Nucleus attraction energy

E(xc)= Exchange correlation energy

The value of exchange correlation energy, E(xc), is very less in the order of large values of negative power of 10. But it produces a huge impact on the total energy of the molecule. If we don’t consider the value of E(xc), and calculate the ionisation energy with the remaining equation the value will come out in negative, that’s an error, as we know the ionisation energy can not have negative values.
DFT is named that way because the theory is contributed by tens of scientist. So we can’t give it a name unlike Schrödinger theory or Hartree-Fock theory. But we can not ignore the pioneering work of Kohn and Sham, who gave the fundamental equation of DFT, that is known as Kohn-Sham equation.

For calculating energy from the Kohn-Sham equation, we need to find density, rho.
Density can be calculated as follows.

The above calculation is done computationally using Gaussian software. For this, we need to feed it with different basis set followed by the name of method (can be selected by keeping in mind what percentage of accuracy we want in our result as compared to experimental result). Basis set is almost similar to atomic orbitals.
Example of basis set: 6-31+G* (Six minus three one plus G star)

Where, 6 gives 6Gaussians for the core electrons, 3 gives 3Gaussians, 1 gives 1Gaussians respectively for the valence electrons- which gives a total of 10Gaussians for a single electron system, i.e, H atom. Higher the number of Gaussian, higher is the accuracy of the result with experimental values for a particular atom or molecule. For higher accuracy in result, we can use the term CBS (means: complete basis set). In other words, ‘Gaussian’ is the unit of accuracy.
For Hydrogen atom (1s1), if we use 6-31G basis set, we will get 10G. For Lithium (1s2 2s1), we will get 30G.

For DFT, the total number of integration is given by, N^3, for Hartree-Fock Theory, the number of integration is N^4 and for MP2 theory the number of calculation is N^5 (where N is the number of Gaussians). Higher the value of integration, higher is the accuracy and higher is the time it consumes. Here is a latest theory that gives the theoretical result with so accuracy that even let us doubt the value of experimental result. This is called CCSD(T), i.e, Couple Cluster Singlet Doublet with perturbation Triplet. Now imagine the calculation of energy with the help of CCSD(T)/CBS. This takes a total of N^7 integration. It may take 2 years approximately to calculate the energy of Hydrogen molecule with our laptops.

Now the fact is that, DFT gives a poor value of exchange energy but a good value of correlation energy. On the other hand, Hartree Fock theory gives a good value of exchange energy and poor value of correlation energy. The human nature is to experiment with things that they do not understand and Scientists are no different. So they made the hybrid of HF and DFT to get a better result of exchange and correlation energy. In the language of Gaussian software, it is called B3LYP (Becke’s 3 parameter hybrid functional with correlation from Lee, Yang and Parr).

B3LYP: DFT+HF

To get a pure result based on DFT, one can use BP86 (Becke and Perdew exchange correlation functional invented in the year 1986).

BP86: DFT

NASA Confirms Seven Earth-Like Planets Orbiting A Nearby Star: Three of Them Has The Chance To Have Alien Life

NASA finally found 7 habitable planets orbiting a common star, which is 39 light years away from us. 

Photo Credit: NASA

NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope revealed the system of 7 exoplanets orbiting a star TRAPPIST-1, named after the Transiting Planets and Planetesimals Small Telescope (TRAPPIST) in Chile. In May 2016, researchers using TRAPPIST reported three exoplanets of the system, finally after groundbreaking research and using sophisticated Spitzer telescope, four more planets are found orbiting the star.
According to the scientists, 3 out of these 7 planets are in the Goldilocks zone, means their distance from their star is such that it is neither too hot, nor too cold to support liquid water on their surface. The mass and densities of these planets are calculated. Based on the data, all the planets are likely to be rocky. Though the mass of the 7th planet are not yet calculated, but it is thought to be “icy-snowball” like planet. 
The star that the seven planets are orbiting is called a red dwarf– it’s small, dim, and cool compared to our own sun, but it can burn for a very, very long time– somewhere on the order of a trillion years, or even longer.
The discovery sets a record of largest number of habitable planets orbiting a common star.
Carl Sagan once quoted, “The universe is a pretty big place. If it’s just us, seems like an awful waste of space.”

Thanks For Reading 🙂
Reference:

1. Michaël Gillon, Amaury H. M. J. Triaud, Brice-Olivier Demory, Emmanuël Jehin, Eric Agol, Katherine M. Deck, Susan M. Lederer, Julien de Wit, Artem Burdanov, James G. Ingalls, Emeline Bolmont, Jeremy Leconte, Sean N. Raymond, Franck Selsis, Martin Turbet, Khalid Barkaoui, Adam Burgasser, Matthew R. Burleigh, Sean J. Carey, Aleksander Chaushev, Chris M. Copperwheat, Laetitia Delrez, Catarina S. Fernandes, Daniel L. Holdsworth, Enrico J. Kotze, Valérie Van Grootel, Yaseen Almleaky, Zouhair Benkhaldoun, Pierre Magain, Didier Queloz. Seven temperate terrestrial planets around the nearby ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1 . Nature, 2017; 542 (7642): 456 DOI: 10.1038/nature21360